Papal election hackproof (and evolutionary)

Schneier, security guru, details the voting system and concludes,

When an election process is left to develop over the course of a couple thousand years, you end up with something surprisingly good.

Well, good enough to elect someone who would say this:

Theories of evolution which, because of the philosophies which inspire them, regard the spirit either as emerging from the forces of living matter, or as a simple epiphenomenon of that matter, are incompatible with the truth about man. (speech 22-Oct-96)

But, Pope, if Schneier's observation can be generalized, we could then hypothesize:

When an iteratively complex system of replicators is left to develop over the course of a couple billion years, you end up with something surprisingly good, so good in fact that you might assume in error it represents "a great ontological discontinuity" rather than a "simple epiphenomenon".

Course, that's just me seeing evolution everywhere.

[Published: 15-Apr-05 | Permalink | Category: In response | Comments]

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated so please have patience. An email address is required but won't be shown or disclosed to anyone if I can help it because I don't like spam either.

:

:

: Remember Me?

:
Allowed:

a href, b, i, br/, p, strong, em, ul, ol, li, blockquote, pre

Movable Type 3.2 | common syndicated-feed-icon.gif feed(add to Google) (validate it) | Creative Commons license | xml sitemap | xhtml1.0 | css | File under: verisimilitude, packed with

ortholog.com: commonplacings, preponed futures, brainworthy memes, paradigm fragments, rigorously conceived musings, gists, free association on free science, stuff I have nowhere else to put. All the opinions and interpretations are my own. This site exists neither for nor despite you, but you are more than welcome to read it.