Schneier, security guru, details the voting system and concludes,
When an election process is left to develop over the course of a couple thousand years, you end up with something surprisingly good.
Well, good enough to elect someone who would say this:
Theories of evolution which, because of the philosophies which inspire them, regard the spirit either as emerging from the forces of living matter, or as a simple epiphenomenon of that matter, are incompatible with the truth about man. (speech 22-Oct-96)
But, Pope, if Schneier's observation can be generalized, we could then hypothesize:
When an iteratively complex system of replicators is left to develop over the course of a couple billion years, you end up with something surprisingly good, so good in fact that you might assume in error it represents "a great ontological discontinuity" rather than a "simple epiphenomenon".
Course, that's just me seeing evolution everywhere.
[Published: 15-Apr-05 | Permalink | Category: In response | Comments]Movable Type 3.2 |
feed (add to Google) (validate it) | Creative Commons license | xml sitemap | xhtml1.0 | css | File under: verisimilitude, packed with
ortholog.com: commonplacings, preponed futures, brainworthy memes, paradigm fragments, rigorously conceived musings, gists, free association on free science, stuff I have nowhere else to put. All the opinions and interpretations are my own. This site exists neither for nor despite you, but you are more than welcome to read it.
Post a comment
Comments are moderated so please have patience. An email address is required but won't be shown or disclosed to anyone if I can help it because I don't like spam either.