In an odd little review on Nature News (link, paywall rising soon), Kendall Brown pays a visit to Kansas and reviews Flock Of Dodos, a movie about the Intelligent Design controversy. At a meeting in the local science museum (included to inform us, should we be so dim, that not all Kansans are ID-championing hicks), the writer-director Steve Miller says one of the weirdest things about science and education I've ever heard, and Brown doesn't pick up on it:
Miller points out the caricature of Albert Einstein that greets museum-goers. "We haven't had a rock star scientist since Einstein," he notes. "What's the incentive for kids to go into discovery science?"
Duh. What does he think goes on in kids' heads? Kids don't become rock stars because of rock stars - they become rock stars because of rock. Scientists become scientists because of science, not from looking up to Albert or having posters of Charles and his posse of finches on their bedroom walls. Kids might get into sport because they worship a hero, but they don't get good unless they worship the game. Most people can't name a living scientist but they can name a living sports hero and a living rock star; however, this inequality is not the reason why Intelligent Design prospers in the Bible belt or why enrolment in university science courses is low.
[Later: Steve Miller commented that his real words have been, er, under-reported in typical journalist abbreviative style, and the true gist/context lost. He was a little more nuanced on the day. Still, as he implies, any space in Nature is going to be good for the movie's exposure.]
[Published: 06-Feb-06 | Permalink | Category: In response | Comments]Movable Type 4.1 |
feed (add to Google) (validate it)
| Creative Commons license | xml sitemap | xhtml1.0 | css | File under: bolting the door with a boiled carrot
ortholog.com: commonplacings, preponed futures, brainworthy memes, paradigm fragments, rigorously conceived musings, gists, free association on free science, stuff I have nowhere else to put. All the opinions and interpretations are my own. This site exists neither for nor despite you, but you are more than welcome to read it.
…s miller said:
Hi Saw your note about our film and the quote by me related to rock star scientists. Not surprisingly, the story didn't capture the essense of what I said, which was related to the fact that there are so few scientists who are recognized - and trusted - by the public that the museum had to put a picture of Einstein up to convey "science." I agree with you that scientists don't go into science to become rock starts, etc. Duh. A problem is that scientists rarely spend the time these days explaining what they do and why it's important using communication tools that reach broad audiences. We need charismatic and engaging scientists who by the fact that they are experts and good at comnmunicating they eventually become extremely well known and trusted - that's what I meant by becoming rock stars... Also, I am a producer on the film, not writer director. Glad that you took notice of the Nature posting. We were pleased to get a Nature write to the film screening.
13-Feb-06 (1250)
Post a comment
Comments are moderated so please have patience. An email address is required but won't be shown or disclosed to anyone if I can help it because I don't like spam either.