The tree falling in the forest is not even there

(This reads to me like an April Fool story or one of those spoof of pseudoscientific gobbledygook to me but they seem po-faced enough so you never know.) Apparently--working on the assumption that the available interpretations of quantum phenomena are more than just metaphors close to or at breaking point--objective reality is a consensus of possible realities selected by a process of iterative observer enquiry which they call "quantum darwinism". Decoherence is a democratic process as repeated observations incline subgroups of quantum states asymptotically towards a simulacrum of objective reality. Sounds more like incoherence than decoherence? Wait for the New Scientist article.